In evolutionary biology, small mutations -- genetic "accidents" if you will -- occur naturally and occasionally. Sometimes these mutations turn out to be beneficial and live on, perhaps to even become a new species eventually. Consider the first fish that had the ability to breathe air on land, eventually leading to amphibians. Sometimes these offshoots of an evolutionary line go extinct, only to become an interesting curiosity in the fossil record. One might think of our distant forebearers, the Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis) -- not a direct ancestor exactly, but more like an evolutionary cousin, whom some anthropologists believe may have even co-existed with early Homo Sapiens, but eventually died off, becoming an evolutionary dead-end.
In looking at bicycle derailleurs over the past couple of articles (HERE
, and HERE
), I couldn't help but see a similar phenomenon -- evolutionary dead ends in the line of bicycle components.
In the mid-to-late-80s, Campagnolo was fighting for its life. In 1985, Shimano introduced a new click-shifting version of Dura-Ace and kicked off the indexing revolution. Suddenly, everyone wanted click-shift derailleurs. SunTour responded quickly (though some would argue not quickly enough), while Campagnolo apparently hoped indexed shifting was a fad that would go away, and their first attempts at competing with it just could not hold their own against the competition. Not only that, but mountain bikes were sweeping the market, dominated by Japanese component groups. Between 1985 and 1990, Campagnolo introduced C-Record, Chorus, Croce d'Aune, and Athena -- each with a different derailleur design. In addition, there were two versions released of their Syncro indexing shift levers, plus Centaur and Euclid mountain-bike groups. By 1991, virtually all of them were either completely redesigned, or phased out.
|Version one of the Syncro levers.|
Note the extra lever on the right,
which switched from indexing
to friction shifting modes.
Campagnolo took a very different approach than the Japanese to indexing with their Syncro design in 1987. Whereas Shimano and SunTour designed full systems of interrelated parts -- shift levers, derailleurs, freewheels/cassettes, chains, and even cables (necessitating a complete drivetrain component upgrade, or better yet, just a whole new bike) -- Campagnolo, on the other hand, tried to make Syncro work with their existing derailleurs. It didn't work. The standard parallelogram with a single spring-loaded pivot (which essentially dated back to about 1950) did not track the cogs as closely as the dropped/slanted parallelogram architecture, had a wide "chain gap" on the smaller cogs, and required a fair amount of the overshift/back-off technique to make the shift. None of this translated to good success with indexing. Not only that, but the design and spacing of the cogs, plus the chain design, and the fine-tuning of cable tension, all contributed to making indexed shifting reliable. Campy just didn't have it.
The C-Record derailleur had a sleek, modern, aerodynamic design, but functionally shared the same traditional architecture of the Super Record. The only real addition was to include a spring-loaded top pivot (like Simplex) which was an improvement, but not enough to make it index like Dura-Ace, or even the much cheaper Shimano 600 (soon renamed Ultegra) or SunTour's Accushift models. Although an improvement, the C-Record's basic parallelogram structure was on the verge of extinction.
|Diagram from a 1988 Chorus advertisement.|
In 1987-88, Campagnolo released Chorus -- the first of their derailleurs to make a complete break with the traditional Campy design. It included a dropped, slanted parallelogram -- with a twist -- literally. Not content to just copy the Japanese design, Campagnolo designed the Chorus with a special 2-position parallelogram that could be tilted a little or a lot, depending on the range of the freewheel being used. A review of the group in Cyclist
magazine, Feb. 1988, said, "We found Chorus worked better than any other Campy derailleur -- including the top-of-the-line C-Record. The Chorus derailleur shifted more precisely and was a lot quieter than past Campy derailleurs." They went on to say, "If you want indexed shifting on your all-Campy bike, Chorus plus Synchro is the best combination." As glowing as that review was, I don't believe that opinion was shared by all. The 2-position parallelogram was a really interesting idea -- but it never caught on. It would prove to be an evolutionary dead end.
|With its tie-rod actuation, the Croce d'Aune worked like no |
other derailleur before or since.
In early 1988, Campagnolo released Croce d'Aune, named after the famous mountain pass where the young Tullio Campagnolo, his fingers frozen numb in the cold, was inspired to create the first quick release hub. The Croce d'Aune derailleur was a true oddity. Like the C-Record and almost all other Campy derailleurs dating back to the original Gran Sport, it utilized the traditional hanging parallelogram structure. Unlike any other, it used a combination of cable actuation and an unusual articulating tie-rod to keep it tracking the cogs closely with a narrower chain gap. Campy called it a "twin axle" system. According to Chuck Schmidt, of Velo-Retro
, the top of the tie-rod was held by the derailleur fixing bolt with a ball joint, and the bottom of the rod moved with the derailleur body. Pulling the lever to shift, the cable pulled the body back, while the tie rod pushed the derailleur body inwards, driving it from one cog to the next. Again, the claim was that it would work better with indexed shifting -- but the market must have believed otherwise. The complicated and unusual structure never caught on and it was redesigned a few short years later. Another evolutionary dead-end.
|The original Athena looked like a traditional Campy-style|
derailleur, but the parallelogram was actually canted for
better tracking down the profile of the cogs.
In 1988-89, the Athena group was introduced, with yet another
derailleur design. At first glance, the Athena appeared to share the traditional Campagnolo parallelogram structure. Not quite, though. If one looks a little closer, it becomes apparent that the parallelogram is actually canted at an angle. It looks
like a traditional hanging parallelogram, but its angled movement would carry it downward as it moved inward towards the larger cogs, or upwards toward the smaller ones -- mimicking somewhat the movement of a slant parallelogram design. Another detail was that it had a small toothed "stop" at the upper pivot to set the angle of the derailleur as it hung from the dropout. It could be adjusted for different cog sizes. I've used the Athena, not with Campy's Synchro indexing shift levers, but rather with their excellent "retrofriction"
levers (another nice bit of componentry that didn't survive the indexing era). With those smooth-acting levers, I've found that the Athena is a really nice shifting little derailleur. If it had been designed with a spring-loaded top pivot, instead of the little toothed stop, it might have been even better. The little adjustable toothed ring can break pretty easily, leaving the derailleur to pull forward without a stop until the pulley cage crashes into the cogs. It's happened to me, and I've seen others that have suffered the same fate (and good luck finding a replacement for the little ring!). Unfortunate, really. Again, it became another evolutionary dead-end.
|This little toothed ring on the mounting bolt|
allowed one to adjust for different sprockets.
The Syncro levers themselves also were redesigned in that 5-year timespan. The original levers, shown above, had an extra, smaller lever on the right side, that switched the unit from friction to indexing mode. In order to make it work with different derailleurs and cog sets, there were interchangeable inserts to control the number and spacing of the "clicks." There are people who love the system, and admittedly, it was admirable that Campy at least attempted to make it compatible with existing components, rather than necessitating a complete upgrade. But many found it pretty "finicky" to get set up properly. In 1989, there was a Syncro II, with even more insert rings for more compatibility with different drivetrain options, including 8-speed. The second version is identifiable for its large, knurled ring on the right side, in place of the mini lever, to switch between friction and indexing. By '92, the switchable Syncro levers with interchangeable rings were replaced with a simpler index-only lever for 8-speeds, along with Ergo integrated brake/shift levers.
By 1991, Campagnolo decided that when it came to the Japanese competition, they were better off just copying them rather than trying to beat them at their own game. The line of derailleurs, with all its unique variations, was completely redesigned -- all across the board with dropped, slanted parallelograms, borrowing heavily from the designs being used by Shimano. In addition, they came up with specially shaped cog teeth, not unlike Shimano's Hyperglide, all to finally get indexed shifting systems that worked the way the consumers seemed to be demanding.
Looking at the parts shown above, it's pretty clear Campagnolo in those years was doing anything they could to remain not only competitive, but innovative. Not content to just copy the Shimano and SunTour designs, they tried to remain true to their heritage and make their traditional designs work in the new era. The Chorus, Croce d'Aune, and Athena, all had very different approaches to improve shifting performance, but ultimately none of the innovations would last. Sadly (to my Retrogrouch sensibility, anyhow) the way Campagnolo regained its reputation as an innovator was to start squeezing extra cogs onto the cassette -- jumping ahead of Shimano first with 10, then 11 cogs. Now that Shimano is making their own 11 speed cassettes, what else is there to do for "innovation" but to try for 12?
Something to think about: The original Gran Sport was made with few changes for about 13 years or so. The Nuovo Record was made for even longer. The basic architecture of those derailleurs was used for roughly 40 years! Today, new components are introduced almost every year, with incremental changes billed as major design revolutions. The way the bicycle industry seems intent on making our bikes "obsolete" almost as soon as we ride them, it appears that their current slogan might be "mutate or die"!
I greatly enjoyed reading this. I used Synchro in all it's variations and had all of the derailleurs you mention at one time or another. My own history with Campagnolo goes back to, as a green team mechanic, losing patience and getting on a plane, a train and a bus to Vicenza (not so easy then as it is now) and fetching up un-announced at the Campagnolo factory to talk to the guys that made the Delta brake because I couldn't get it to work as I *knew* it should. Once they'd got over their surprise, they were most helpful and accommodating ... and 20 years later, invoted me to set up and run their main UK technical and Service Centre (which is part of what our business does now) ...ReplyDelete
So thank you for this - it's a great reminder of those sometimes very frustrating days. Synchro 2 Nirvana was eventually located by the way - Sedis chain, Regina America freewheel, CdA rear derailleur and Synchro 2 with (I think) the yellow insert. It worked ... most of the time!
I've also had very good luck with both the Athena and Croce d'Aune Syncro systems. I have a DeRosa with the first Chorus/Syncro group and that shifts well, too. It's mostly a matter of matching the chain, freewheel and shifter insert and getting the chainlength and wheel position right. Of course, the cheapest Shimano systems will usually shift flawlessly if setup by a monkey and ignored for five years.ReplyDelete
It should be pointed out that the first generation Syncro pulled less cable than later versions, said to have been intended to allow the indexing to work with the Nuovo and Super Record rear mechs. This was mentioned in the article, but it's important to point out that the Syncro II components are not compatible with the earlier systems. I believe all the Ergoshifters were Syncro II, making them incompatible with C-Record, early Chorus, and possibly Athena derailleurs.
Campy made a special insert for the Ergoshifters that allowed them to index when matched with Shimano rear derailleurs in the 8-speed era. These were sold by Sachs and have that name molded in their hoods.
That is true that the first Syncro was intended to be backwards-compatible with the old Nuovo/Super Record derailleurs. An admirable, but ultimately unworkable effort. The interchangeable inserts were also admirable in that they tried to make a broadly compatible system, but for many people it was just too complicated to sort out the right combinations. Ultimately, what made Shimano such a success is that it was designed to be one integrated system that included the derailleur, the cogs, the chain, and even the cables and housing, with no attempt to mix and match any of the components. It locked people into buying all-Shimano, but people were happy to give up the flexibility because it worked so well.Delete
BTW, I'm quite sure that the Synchro II would not work with C-Record, which was an old design derailleur, designed before indexing was a thing (streamlined and modern looking, but ultimately not much different in action from NR/SR) - However, I see no reason why Syncro II or Ergo shifters wouldn't work with early Chorus and Athena derailleurs since both derailleurs were designed for indexing. For the most part, if a derailleur can work with indexing (as any derailleur made since about 1988 or so) then it really comes down more to the shifters, cogs, and chain being compatible with each other. For example, if you have Shimano shifters and the proper cassette and chain to match them, you can throw a Campy derailleur into the mix and it will still work fine. Works the other way, too.
Coming back to an old thread, the final point is not true. Different systems pull different amounts of cable at the leaver and this needs to be matched to the derailleur. The cog spacings then need to match the derailleur steps. One interesting thing I have found is that, although it's not supposed to be compatible, I have a set of Shimano 600 7-speed indexed downtube shifters, shifting a Deore derailleur over a 7-speed Suntour cassette on my main commuter and it shifts flawlessly. Before I switched to the cassette, I was using a 7-speed Suntour freewheel and that also shifted well. Apparently, cog spacing is less critical as matching the derailleur and lever.Delete
I am wondering, for me Syncro II is the knurled knob right hand syncro lever system as opposed to Syncro I being the one actuated by the little lever. I have Syncro I & II running with Croce D'Aune rear derailleurs, and they run very nicely so when you say Syncro II won't run with C-record, it's not in a generic sense but purely C- Record rear erailleurs, is that correct?ReplyDelete
As I understand/remember them, I believe you are right -- Synchro I had the little mini lever, and Synchro II had the knurled knob. OK - tough question - will either version of Synchro work with the C-Record derailleur. The C-Rec derailleur was an old design with a traditional parallelogram. It would simply not work as well for indexing as a more modern derailleur with a slant parallelogram (like Shimano and all current derailleurs). Synchro 1 was supposed to work with the C-Rec, but it certainly wouldn't work nearly as well as Shimano. It may be a mistake to say Synchro II couldn't be made to work with the C-Record derailleur -- it's possible that with the right cogs and chain, and the correct inserts for the levers, etc., one could get it to work - but again, I doubt it would be as slick as Shimano indexing, or any modern indexing system.Delete
The Croce derailleur is an interesting one that has a somewhat different action than other derailleurs - if you're using it with Synchro I and II, and it works, that's a good thing.
I'm working on setting up one of these Athena RD's with Veloce 9 speed shifters. Any reason this shouldn't work? I've got it pretty close, but can't get the indexing completely dialed in. And, it's a pretty tight loop on the bit of cable housing that goes from the derailleur to the frame. Maybe need to adust RD downward somehow? First go at Campag, so it's all new to me, but like the shifting action. FD perfect first try. Nice.ReplyDelete
I would think you could get it to work, but it may take some trial and error - fiddling with the angle (using that little toothed ring), making sure the cable loop is the right length so it doesn't bind anywhere, etc. I think that as long as it has enough range of movement to get across the whole cassette, it should probably be workable. Just for grins, I tried it once with modern Campy 10-sp Ergo and got it to work on most of the shifts, but had trouble on the outermost cogs - but I didn't spend any time at all on fiddling and fine tuning to see if I could get it to work better.Delete
I too would like to try my old rod Croce D'Aune rear derailleur on a 9 speed Campagnolo cassette with retrofriction down tube shifters. I'm not sure if the derailleur has the throw to cross that many cogs?Delete
Interesting blog with lots of tech-details! I recently purchased an 86 Benotto, mostly equipped with Shimano 105 components from then, which I'd like to rebuild with Campy parts (mid 80s - early 90s). Although I grew up with downtube friction levers, I do have to admit I miss index-shifting when riding this nice bike.ReplyDelete
Contemplating on using Campy Synchro II downtube levers. The spacing between the dropouts is about 126mm. So I guess a 126/127mm Athena 7-speed hub, with an Athena rear derailler should work with Synchro II levers? Or is there a different/better setup for the given specs? Quite confused after reading so many different opinions on whether or not Synchro II works. Maybe the hassle isn't worth it and I should rather go for Simplex retrofriction (or Campy, if I can find some)?
I think Synchro 2 worked, but you need to make sure you've got the right freewheel/cassette spacing to match the correct insert in the levers, etc. It can be finicky.ReplyDelete
Meanwhile I purchased a nice NOS set of Athena hubs (7-speed) and equipped it with a new Miche cassette (8-speed, removed 1 cog). Now I discovered that the shifter bosses are 'Shimano A Type', with their unique shape and 4.5mm threads. So I guess without modification, only very few Shimano friction levers will fit, correct?Delete
So far, I haven't been able to find a proper solution. Since the frame's orignal paint is still in such good condition, I don't want to try to modify the existing shifter bosses, or remove/replace them completely. Perhaps any suggestions on properly modifying either Campy Snycro, or alternatively Simlex Retrofriction levers? But if it's too much a long shot, I'll just have to stick with the Shimano's made for their boss type...
I have both the Athena derailleur mentioned here and an early Victory derailleur (circa 1985 according to Disraeli gears). They both share that quirky "bush ring", both share the same fault, same place, a crack just past the toothed section.ReplyDelete
BjornLate, I have that same Victory derailleur, broke the cage trying to straighten it. I have a chance at a 1989 Athena derailleur, but has no hanger bolt or bush ring. I believe the bush ring is the same as the Victory. Do you know if the hanger bolt from the Victory will work on the Athena?Delete
The little ring does look very similar. I wish I knew if the mounting bolt was the same or not. I don't have a Victory in my possession to compare the bolts.Delete
I have an old rear derailleur which is an unholy abomination that combines a chorus hanger and paralellogram with a C-record jockeywheel "bracket" and shimano jockey wheels. It was cobbled together in the early 1990's for Finnish semi pro bike racing. I'd love to have indexed shifting for it, but Suncro shift levers are almost impossible to find these days. Btw, this abomination works perfectly on a 10 speed rear casette :)ReplyDelete